Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Durability: Where do we Stand?
AbstractTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was initially reserved for inoperable or high surgical risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, but after the recent publication of randomized studies comparing TAVI to surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) among intermediate risk (PARTNER 2 and SURTAVI) and low risk patients (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk), the momentum for further expansion of TAVI at the expense of AVR seems irreversible. The main obstacle before the wider application of TAVI for intermediate and lower risk patients is the uncertainty regarding bioprosthetic valve durability and the potential for structural deterioration and dysfunction over time. A concise overview regarding bioprosthetic valve durability issues, the relevant current scientific data and their importance for TAVI patient selection and management is herein presented. Rhythmos 2020;15(1):72-76.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).